Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Posted
We had a motor fail on a critical pump this morning. It is a 125 HP vertical inline pump, 1800 RPM, motor can be wired 230 or 460V, we run the pump at 460 V.

Under the cathead we found that one of the leads we would use if we were to wire it for 230 V had worn through and was burnt. We beleive the failure was due to a short of this wire due to vibration and or heat in the motor.

We are having the motor rewound and have asked the motor shop if the motor can be rewound just for 460 V and eliminate the alternate leads for 230 V operation.

Our thinking is that we would never need to run the pump at 230 V and we can eliminate a potential failure mode by doing it this way. I think we can also free up some space under the cathead and lower the risk that the 460 V leads that we actually use will short due to insulation wearing through because of limited space under cathead.

Any chance there are some negatives I am missing with this plan?

Thanks,

John
 
Posts: 13 | Location: Durham, NC | Registered: 02 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
I don't see any negatives.

OK, technically, someone could argue there may be small benefits to extra leads available during motor testing. But I doubt anyone would ever use that capability even if you have it. And assuming you don't have any 230v applications, you would never have any need for those other leads.
 
Posts: 3076 | Location: Texas Gulf Coast | Registered: 20 February 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
There are no negatives. Have the motor shop either replace the nameplate or stamp out the lower voltage rating and related current so that there are no issues in the future.

Howard


Howard W Penrose, Ph.D., CMRP
President, SUCCESS by DESIGN Reliability Services
Author: "Physical Asset Management for the Executive (Caution: Don't Read this on an Airplane)" and;
"Electrical Motor Diagnostics: 2nd Edition"
 
Posts: 844 | Location: Connecticut, Michigan and Illinois | Registered: 12 April 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Pete and Howard - Thanks for your responses.

John
 
Posts: 13 | Location: Durham, NC | Registered: 02 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 


Copyright © 2004-2008 NetexpressUSA Inc. All rights reserved.