|
|
|
| |
| Posts: 16 | Location: bei jing china | Registered: 04 July 2008 |    |
|
|
|
I cannot see the second attachment. Can you please post it again. A close up of the fractured section would help.
Elias
|
| |
| Posts: 139 | Location: Vancouver | Registered: 26 June 2007 |    |
|
|
|
Pete, thank you for your comment. quote: (looks like between bearing and coupling) yes,you are right. quote: How far from the fracture to the coupling? maybe 15-20cm quote: And did anything abnormal show up on the vib prior to failure? vib spectrum shows 0.5,2X,1xGMF,2xGMF, but the level just 2mm/s.the vib trend has not changed obviously。 quote: And do you happen to know the shaft material?
i do not know .
HS3.jpg (8 KB, 55 downloads)
|
| |
| Posts: 16 | Location: bei jing china | Registered: 04 July 2008 |    |
|
|
|
David, quote: such as in the the keyway, coupling
i do not think so quote: Can you measure motor current in order to detect variable torque.
no ,only measure vib quote: Also shaft misalignment will also contribute to shaft bending fatique in particular if coupling is locked.
usually there is a flexible coupling to reduce misalignment.however,in"HS3"picture,i cannot see the elastomeric flexible coupling only the coulping locked on the input shaft of gearbox. may be the elastomeric flexible couping lock on the motor output shaft. in this case,i have to check the gearbox input shaft diameter,does it larger than motor shaft.if the motor shaft is larger.i should incrise the gearbox shaft diameter or intall a elastomeric flexible coupling locked on the input shaft of gearbox. Am i right
|
| |
| Posts: 16 | Location: bei jing china | Registered: 04 July 2008 |    |
|