Join or Manage Your Profile
Posting Boards
Machinery Condition Monitoring and Predictive Maintenance
Posts About vibration/alignment/balance
reference for airgap tolerances|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
I have heard in general, airgap measurements should be within 10% of the average for 2-pole machines and 20% for slower machines.
Does anyone have a reference for this? (I have found some references that apply 10% to all machines but can't find the one that allows 20% for slower machines)> |
|||
|
Hey Pete just did a quick search and found this on the web hope it helps http://www.findarticles.com look in hear for an article on air gap and how it is arrived at
|
||||
|
Pete,
I don't have any documentation on it but have always heard 10% on everything. I will check with our test guy next week and see if he has anything on it. Ronnie |
||||
|
Pete,
I went to the website Lee posted and did a search and came up with this site http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3726/is_200509/ai_n15349943/pg_2 It is a good article but specifically paragraph twelve of page two states + or - 10% average air gap. Hope that helps, Ronnie |
||||
|
Pete:
The EASA published standards, as well as several other industry standards, including the NEMA MG-1, show the 20% max. Personally, I would shoot for the 10%, it is not un-doable, and can be included in your own spec to a repair shop. I am traveling, but will be happy to post a reference when I return next week. Howard Howard W Penrose, Ph.D., CMRP President, SUCCESS by DESIGN Reliability Services Author: "Physical Asset Management for the Executive (Caution: Don't Read this on an Airplane)" and; "Electrical Motor Diagnostics: 2nd Edition" |
||||
|
Thanks. I have been unable to find anything about 20% in NEMA MG1 or EASA AR100.
I agree 10% should be achievable. We have a unique situation of motor already being reassembled, will be run in the near future (no uncoupled run yet) and I am asked to evaluate whether the airgap readings (somewhere around 13% deviation from average) should be accepted. It seems to me if 10% is acceptable for 2-pole than 13% should be no problem for a 4-pole. I just wish I had some solid backup (reference) to prove it. |
||||
|
Pete:
Part 14 of the attached medium voltage repair specification. I had developed this for customers of the repair shop I worked for in the early 1990's. I will let you know if I find other references. Howard Howard W Penrose, Ph.D., CMRP President, SUCCESS by DESIGN Reliability Services Author: "Physical Asset Management for the Executive (Caution: Don't Read this on an Airplane)" and; "Electrical Motor Diagnostics: 2nd Edition" Form_Wound_Repair_Specification.pdf (165 Kb, 41 downloads) |
||||
|
Thanks Doc. Looks like a good spec. Also another reference for 10%.
14.2 - "No feeler gauge reading shall deviate from the average of all readings at that end of the motor by more than 10% of the average. If the deviation is greater, the cause shall be determined and corrected." |
||||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Join or Manage Your Profile
Posting Boards
Machinery Condition Monitoring and Predictive Maintenance
Posts About vibration/alignment/balance
reference for airgap tolerances
