Join or Manage Your Profile
Posting Boards
Machinery Condition Monitoring and Predictive Maintenance
Posts About vibration/alignment/balance
allowable background vibration level vs false brinelling|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
I tried a forum search for related topics and got zeroed.
I recall some limits being discussed, but maybe that was on the old board. I seem to recall numbers like 0.03 inches per second over all or filtered for a packaged new bearing to avoid false brinelling. Does anybody have a source ? Thanks , Dan Timberlake Dan Timberlake |
|||
|
I don't know any limits for storage or otherwise. One thing that limits susceptibility is the orientation of the bearing as you probably know. Store it as if it's mounted on a vertical shaft (I'm not sure if you call the horizontal or vertical).
I have only one data point to offer. 0.17 ips on the bearing housing of a between bearings centrifugal pump while secured IS enough to cause false brinneling within a few years. |
||||
|
Thanks Pete.
That's the ball park I'd figure would be much-much-too-much, and we are probably higher than that. My recollection was one of our European brethren (maybe Arne) had a value,and maybe a link to some published SKF or FAG specs. I think it was well under 0.1 ips. I'm putting together a "trades" table for a presentation showing why I am afraid to decouple a pony motor and let it sit idle in a truly miserable environment. Dan Timberlake |
||||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Join or Manage Your Profile
Posting Boards
Machinery Condition Monitoring and Predictive Maintenance
Posts About vibration/alignment/balance
allowable background vibration level vs false brinelling
