Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Posted
What vibration levels would you suggest should be expected from a pump in the classification
- a machine above 300kW mounted on a rigid and heavy foundation.
we are suggesting rms accn of 23m/s2 and rms velocity 1.8mm/s - is this too stringent?
 
Posts: 15 | Location: Whyalla South Aust | Registered: 13 April 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
No! Not too tight. I would expect better.


Cordially,
Sam Pickens
pdmsampickens@gmail.com

 
Posts: 1660 | Location: Eastern USA | Registered: 04 August 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
OLI
Posted Hide Post
Including vane pass frequency that "always" exist?
In my book, there are no "stiff" foundations. Post a picture to convince me you have found one :-). Is it possible to run this separately so you only get vibration from this unit, as some standards prescribe? I find that required when demanding so tight specs and in reality very rarely operatively possible to perform. In some cases however you can find that lo levels and even lower so everything is possible. Olov


olov dot li at vtab dot se
www.vtab.se
 
Posts: 594 | Location: Linköping | Registered: 03 October 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
OLI makes a point. I have seen pumps with fairly stiff foundations, but if the foundation is truely rigid you get 0 casing vibration.

If you have a good stiff foundation and fluid film bearings, try shaft relative vibration. With rollling element bearings on a rigid foundation, something has to give, and that something may be the bearings.


Regards,
Bill

Bill.Foiles@bp.com
 
Posts: 1005 | Location: Houston, TX USA | Registered: 23 February 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 


Copyright © 2004-2008 NetexpressUSA Inc. All rights reserved.