|
|
If the velocity to displacement converter is external and produces 200 mv/mil then you just need to divide the signal in half. A simple voltage divider may work; your I&C people may be of help.
Regards, Bill
Bill.Foiles@bp.com
|
| |
| Posts: 1005 | Location: Houston, TX USA | Registered: 23 February 2005 |    |
|
|
|
Please don't take this as an insult Jason, but I think it is a crime that NRC restrictions and regulations have you scrounging for parts for a system that was obsoleted almost 20 years ago. I also wonder if public safety is really served by reactor systems that cannot be upgraded to new technology.
e-mail me at steven dot schultheis at gmail dot com
|
| |
| Posts: 346 | Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Registered: 21 February 2005 |    |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Posts: 28 | Location: Dallas, TX | Registered: 04 March 2005 |    |
|
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Steve Schultheis: Please don't take this as an insult Jason, but I think it is a crime that NRC restrictions and regulations have you scrounging for parts for a system that was obsoleted almost 20 years ago. I also wonder if public safety is really served by reactor systems that cannot be upgraded to new technology.
I agree with you, if I added up the hours and cost of the research that has been involved with the searching we could have easily had the replacement paid for. This is something I have been working on but unfortunately this is a 2+ year process.
|
| |
| Posts: 102 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: 15 February 2007 |    |
|