|
|
Not for long. Have you spectral profile data in g's? Interesting to predict exact time of failure or see how close one can get. Just a fun thing.
Cordially, Sam Pickens pdmsampickens@gmail.com
|
| |
| Posts: 1661 | Location: Eastern USA | Registered: 04 August 2004 |    |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Posts: 102 | Location: Carrollton, KY USA | Registered: 30 April 2004 |    |
|
|
|
For a 5 hp motor driving a pump, if you keep it greased, 1-3 months, maybe longer. If you have clearance, and lubrication, and the cage doesn't come apart, it will run until something else (motor rotor, pump impeller) locks up.
Regards,
Rusty
|
| |
| Posts: 1254 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: 20 February 2005 |    |
|
|
|
And wow is a good term: I expected to see some different stuff from what was displayed in the g's spectrum, however, dearly beloved - get the head-stone ready: born nn aaa 199n, died 19 JAN 2008. Seriously, it could go anytime but can't see it here next week.
Cordially, Sam Pickens pdmsampickens@gmail.com
|
| |
| Posts: 1661 | Location: Eastern USA | Registered: 04 August 2004 |    |
|
|
|
That one is getting pretty bad but I think I may have you beat. Here is a 5 hp as well with an overhung fan. 2.5 months prior to these readings it looked like yours. Good Luck!
steam_fan.doc (48 Kb, 69 downloads)
|
| |
| Posts: 102 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: 15 February 2007 |    |
|
|
|
When I see high vibration at high frequency (like above 2000Hz) I get concerned about the frequency response of the mounted transducer system.
Regards, Bill
Bill.Foiles@bp.com
|
| |
| Posts: 1005 | Location: Houston, TX USA | Registered: 23 February 2005 |    |
|
|
|
Bill stated the obvious. When you see those data presented with such levels and wonder about the system used and how things were done there is a question posed; is the data valid and reliable? Regardless, giving the benefit of doubt, the thing must be bad at those magnitudes unless ??? Most 100 mV/g transducers will stand 50 g's, some 80 but you have to consider - how can anything on the planet stand 80!!!!!!!!!
Cordially, Sam Pickens pdmsampickens@gmail.com
|
| |
| Posts: 1661 | Location: Eastern USA | Registered: 04 August 2004 |    |
|
|
|
The high g-levels in the original machine are being generated at 2300 Hz. Given the mathematical relationship of acceleration to frequency, 80 g's at this frequency is not going to be as damaging as 80 g's generated at 1000 Hz (for example). A practical example is the "slab lines" in a bad stretch of concrete interstate highway. What happens here is the individual slabs tilt down at the leading edge, and thus up at the trailing edge. Each joint becomes a "fault" in essence (you can see them plainly if you look back in your rearview mirror). Anyways, the faster I go, the smoother the ride. The slower I drive, the harder the jarring is. This isn't a perfect example, but it illustrates the point somewhat that high g-levels at higher frequencies are not as bad as the same g-levels at lower frequencies. Plus, on small machines, the mass is relatively low, so the forces generated are proportionally lower.
Regards,
Rusty
|
| |
| Posts: 1254 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: 20 February 2005 |    |
|
|
|
All true and good points, Rusty. Now, how many days would you give this thing? If I were on call, I would want it changed by the time I left on Friday. 
Danny
|
| |
| Posts: 1595 | Location: Midlothian, VA, US | Registered: 22 February 2005 |    |
|
|
|
quote: , the faster I go, the smoother the ride. The slower I drive, the harder the jarring is.
The ride is not at the point of contact with the tire. Do you think the g level is higher or lower at high speeds? That suspension on that Arkansas Beamer must be doing something. Of course I know that no one in Arkansas would violate a law by going above the speed limit 
Regards, Bill
Bill.Foiles@bp.com
|
| |
| Posts: 1005 | Location: Houston, TX USA | Registered: 23 February 2005 |    |
|