Well it appears that Mr. Gomes and I feel that each of our technologies are the best. Unfortunately, GE has recommended both technologies to it's turbine oil users. However, GE issued ISOPur a part numer without testing an OILKLEEN unit.

I will offer this to GE or any industrial customer for that matter:

OILKLEEN would love to perform a head to head test vs. ISOPur, Kleentek, ASL, Gulfgate, or CC Jenson. Our technology is far superior and many years went into testing and developing it to perfection. And we are willing to prove it to the world.

Mr. Gomes probably doesn't know that one of our older patents is a triple chamber unit with one chamber positive and one chamber negative, and a third where the particles can start to agglomerate. We dont use that patent because most of the agglomeration happens below 2 micron for a long time which means your system is "pushing contamination particles" all through your system until a very long time later when they get large enough and finally your filters pull them out.

I love the competition and welcome anyone willing to run a head to head test with OILKLEEN.

Check out the two case studies in this brochure! They are amazing results...

http://www.oilkleen.com/oilkleen-products/OILKLEEN-500-250.pdf