I am interested to compare our KPI's to other Condition Monitoring Groups. The two main targets we measure ourselves against are the comparison between plant items (CM monitored) that have failed in service, those that are replaced in a planned fashion (due to oil leaks, low IR etc)and those replaced after being flagged by the CM group due to bearing or other CM identified faults. The other main target details the reduction in downtime (on CM monitored conveyor gearboxes, couplings and pulleys) a direct result of the CM program. We are interested to know if these are standard measures or are there any different ideas.
Thanks

I'm not expert on condition-based monitoring (CBM, to differentiate with the abbr CM which stands for corrective maint in our case . However to keep conversation going, I'd like to ask some queries.

Do u track the fllwg aspects of your CBM program:
1) manhours spent on CBM activities vs other maint activities
2) No of eqpt under the CM program, specifically do you include all eqpt, rotating, static, electrical & instrument loops
3) MTBR/MTBF before & after CBM
4) compentency of CBM personnel
5) annual maint cost of eqpt prior to & post CBM
6) scope of your CBM, does it include all CBM activities like vibration, lub oil analysis, thermography, acoustics/noise etc?
7) Do you use CMMS/work order system for planning & scheduling CBM activities?

TQ