Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Posted
Preventive maintenance plans for rotating machinery are well established and published.

But do we really require similar plans for stationary equipment e.g. heat exchangers, furnaces, reactors, vessels etc. Most are inspected on every turnaround i.e., every two years.

What are the best practices around that you people use?

Should stationary equipment be a part of PMP or on required basis maintenance?
 
Posts: 89 | Location: sabaq | Registered: 28 January 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
I recommend maintenance plans for all your equipment that you perform maintenance on. It is the best way to guarantee standardized work, that is to say you know the work should get performed the same way every time you do it.

We even started writing CM work plans on certain equipment to aid system owners and the technicians on known possible breakdowns. It helped drive consistency and overall reliability.

If you have submersed electric heat exchangers I’ve found a megger test to be extremely valuable to judge element condition. Having work plans allows you to record data in the CMMS if you like for later reference.

If you’re ever inspected any a regulating agency it’s so valuable to be able to point to your CMMS system for your work history and maintenance strategy.


I forget what I just said, I wasn't listening.
JW
 
Posts: 133 | Location: Northern Colorado | Registered: 13 July 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Hi Yahoo,

Majority of those are covered under RBI(Risk based Inspection)Policy. that will set the Inspection/Maintenance frequency guidelines based on condition as found ,rather than fixed time maintenance
 
Posts: 40 | Location: qatar | Registered: 18 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Vee
Posted Hide Post
Yahoo,
quote:
But do we really require similar plans for stationary equipment e.g. heat exchangers, furnaces, reactors, vessels etc. Most are inspected on every turnaround i.e., every two years.

I agree with Wally, you need a maintenance plan for ALL equipment.
Parts of the equipment which are pressure containing or require structural integrity can be best analyzed using RBI (KJAP, please note, RBI covers only these areas).
Other parts tend to have age-related failures: wear, creep, corrosion, or fatigue related. These are best done on a fixed time basis, usually beginning with an inspection.
Inspection IS a maintenance activity. The follow-up repairs are also maintenance activities.
++


Regards,
V.Narayan (Vee)
Lead Author, 100 Years of Maintenance: Practical Lessons from Three Lifetimes, Industrial Press.NY ISBN-13: 978-0831133238
Author, Effective Maintenance Management: Risk and Reliability Strategies for Optimizing Performance, 2004, Industrial Press NY ISBN-13: 978-0831131784
 
Posts: 764 | Location: Scotland, UK. | Registered: 16 May 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 


Copyright © 2004-2008 NetexpressUSA Inc. All rights reserved.