Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
3-star Rating (2 Votes) Rate It!  Login/Join 
Posted
Hi every body

I would like to know why Nawelen & heap select for new method for maintinacne strategy a name of RCM ,is it only name or there is a technical reason behaind it

regards,
Alaa
 
Posts: 34 | Location: Saudi arabia | Registered: 11 December 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
<Ozgipsy>
Posted
Dear Sir,

This quote comes from an article I wrote a while ago called Captured by Data.

quote:
"Maintenance" is a term generally used to define the routine activities to sustain standards of performance throughout the in-service, or operational, part of the asset life cycle. In doing this, the maintenance policy designer needs to take account of a range of factors. These include the complexities of operating environment, the available resources for performing maintenance, and the ability of the asset to meet its current performance standards.
.....
In the original report and appendices that produced Reliability-centered Maintenance
(RCM) the authors defined critical failures, initially, as those failures with an impact on safety. Today the term "critical failure" is often used to group failures that will cause what companies consider to be high-impact consequences, a definition that is too variable for a general discussion. For the sake of simplicity, "critical failure" in this paper refers to all failures that will cause the asset to perform to a standard less than what is required of it.

If an asset management program is aimed at maximum cost-effectiveness over an assets life, then it must look at the management of critical failures. By definition, this approach is centered on the reliability of the asset. (Or reliability-centered) So, in essence, the role of the policy designer can be defined as the formulating costeffective asset management programs, routine activities and one-of procedural and design changes, to maintain standards of performance through reducing the likelihood of critical failures to an acceptable level, or eliminating them. This is also the essence of modern RCM.


I have attached the article for your information. Please note that the email address in this article is not currently active.

PDF DocLetter-Captured_by_Data.pdf (311 KB, 24 downloads) Captured by Data
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Thanks for your reply

from what you wrote ,I think I can use the term of RBM " reliability based maintinance " as will , to be frank with teh idea behind the name still not clear .May be after I read the attachment it will eb clear

thanks again
 
Posts: 34 | Location: Saudi arabia | Registered: 11 December 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
or we can use RFM ( reliabilty fouced maintiance )

regards,
 
Posts: 34 | Location: Saudi arabia | Registered: 11 December 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
<Ozgipsy>
Posted
Sir,

The intention is that any approach to maintenance that is focussed on managing the critical failures, therefore reducing downtime, cost, risk to safety etcetera, is therefore centered on the reliability of the asset itself.

And as far as I see, you can call it Susan if you want... Wink
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Note : Stanley Nowlan and Howard Heap did not name RCM after all, here are the details :


MSG 1 : A rudimentary decision diagram technique was devised in 1965 ad in June of 1967, a paper on its use was presented at AIAA Commercial Aircraft Design and Operations Meeting. This decision diagram was first applied to maintenance steering group on BOEING 747 airplane in which the document was called MSG-1

MSG-2 : The use of this decision digram led to further improvements which were incorporated 2 years later in a second document called MSG2

MSG-3 : was used to develop scheduled maintenance programs for military lockheed 1011, Douglas DC10, military aircrafts such as lockheed S3 and P3 and Mc donnel F4J.

The term RCM was named after its author John Moubray, the word 2 or RCM2, indicates that the decision diagram derived is for industry or land based since original RCM is for Airline industry where Stanley Nowlan and Howard Heap emerge. Also, John Moubray is a student of Stanley Nowlanm perhaps this is why Moubray try to think of a decision diagram which can be applied to industries on land.

If you speak about RBM (Reliability-Based Maintenance) it has something to do with Condition-Based or Predictive Maintenance. I hope I clarify to you some matters.


Rolly Angeles
Reliability Consultant


Rolly Angeles
Teacher
www.rsareliability.com
 
Posts: 330 | Location: Philippines | Registered: 09 December 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Vee
Posted Hide Post
Rolly,
Not entirely correct, I am afraid.
N&S did name the process RCM for the first time. Their work entitled Reliability Centered Maintenance WAS published in 1968 through the Dept. of Defense.
Using the RCM decision logic, the airline manufacturers and users developed MSG while the RCM work was going on. N & S led the RCM study; there were also members of the Maintenance Steering Group (MSG).
The RCM process is the work of N&S, not John Moubray. JohnM popularized it and wrote his excellent book RCM II.


Regards,
V.Narayan (Vee)
Lead Author, 100 Years of Maintenance: Practical Lessons from Three Lifetimes, Industrial Press.NY ISBN-13: 978-0831133238
Author, Effective Maintenance Management: Risk and Reliability Strategies for Optimizing Performance, 2004, Industrial Press NY ISBN-13: 978-0831131784
 
Posts: 1027 | Location: Scotland, UK. | Registered: 16 May 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Gents, here is the original Reliability-Centered Maintenance document published at the request of the military (Department of Defense) in 1978 (the request starts on the second page of the attached). I have included the introduction and the table of contents. The complete version (~30MB) can be downloaded from the Reliability section of ReliabilityWeb or from my website http://www.motordiagnostics.com/presentations.htm.

John Moubray's book Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM II) was published in 1992 and was his answer to what he felt were pitfalls in Classical RCM.

From John's book: "Reliability-Centered Maintenance was developed over a period of thirty years. One of the principal milestones in its development was a report commissioned by the United States Department of Defense from United Airlines and prepared by Stanley Nowlan and the late Howard Heap in 1978. The report provided a comprehensive description of the development and application of RCM by the civil aviation industry [MSG 1, 2, 3]. It forms the basis of both editions of this book and of much of the work done in this field outside the airline industry in the last fifteen years."

"Since the early 1980's, the author and his associates have helped companies to apply RCM in hundreds of industrial locations around the world - work which led to the development of RCM2 for industries other than aviation in 1990." - RCM II by John Moubray

Sincerely,
Howard


Howard W Penrose, Ph.D., CMRP
Vice President Operations Dreisilker Electric Motors, Inc. and Editor-in-Chief IEEE DEIS Web
Author: Axiom Business Book Award Winning "Physical Asset Management for the Executive (Caution: Don't Read this on an Airplane)" and; ForeWord Book of the Year Finalist "Electrical Motor Diagnostics: 2nd Edition"


PDF DocPages_from_RCMOrig.pdf (608 KB, 10 downloads)
 
Posts: 884 | Location: Illinois | Registered: 12 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Oh, and the introduction in the attachment in my previous post describes the reason why the called it reliability-centered maintenance, from their own writing.

'Reliability-Based Maintenance' was a term that was trademarked by a commercial entity, I believe it was CSI.

Howard


Howard W Penrose, Ph.D., CMRP
Vice President Operations Dreisilker Electric Motors, Inc. and Editor-in-Chief IEEE DEIS Web
Author: Axiom Business Book Award Winning "Physical Asset Management for the Executive (Caution: Don't Read this on an Airplane)" and; ForeWord Book of the Year Finalist "Electrical Motor Diagnostics: 2nd Edition"
 
Posts: 884 | Location: Illinois | Registered: 12 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Hello Vee,

Thanks for your correction. One of the major difference between the classical RCM and the refined version by John Moubray will be the inclusion of Environmental Consequence on the Logic Tree or RCM Decision Diagram.


Rolly Angeles
Teacher
www.rsareliability.com
 
Posts: 330 | Location: Philippines | Registered: 09 December 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright © 2004-2008 NetexpressUSA Inc. All rights reserved.