Join or Manage Your Profile
Posting Boards
Maintenance and Reliability
Posts About Improving Reliability
Equipment classification|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
I recently did FMEA's for all critical equipments to our process and now i must classify them using Class A-critical machines, Class B - Less critical Machines and class C - run to failure(Mckinsey roadmap for equipment classification)looking at probability of failure and impact of failure how can i do this please assist
ARO_Manual_Guns.xls (50 Kb, 25 downloads) |
|||
|
So, the group that helped Enron?
Nothing should be just 'run to fail'. HOwever, not all should require PdM technologies; rather RCA - extend life to maximum and be done with it. Never bypass a penny. Someone that doesn't take care of the penny shouldn't be entrusted with a dollar! Cordially, Sam Pickens pdmsampickens@gmail.com |
||||
|
There are items that cost less to purchase & install a new unit than invest time to maintain them, run to fail (or run to die) may prove to be an economical solution after all.
Darth Eugene Vader |
||||
|
Hello Giga,
I hope this can help you in your machine ranking. Purpose is to classify which machines belong to Rank A, Rank B and Rank C. Hence priority in maintenance tasks activities should be given to Rank A which is the critical equipments Although, I have to warn you between choosing Rank A, if equipment fails frequently due to its age, might as well decide if its worth restoring or retiring. Machine_Ranking_Matrix.xls (22 Kb, 17 downloads) |
||||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|

